My biggest complaint about cycling (aside from doping and people I don’t like winning races) is how web 2.0 unfriendly it is. Not necessarily the cyclists (hello twitter), because compared to the other sports I follow, they’re pretty accessible. It’s basically everything else, with the exception of places like Podium Cafe and sites like CyclingFans, most cycling websites are not really user friendly. This is not limited to professionally news sites, but especially cyclingnews, which professes to be “the world centre of cycling.” Which, sure, since they have a monopoly on cycling news, I guess it is. But it’s completely unuser friendly and it drives me nuts.
Before your say ‘oh, but they have FORUMS and a TWITTER and BREAKING NEWS,’ I’m going to say right here, that that’s not what I’m talking about. First off, I do not think highly of forums, but that’s my opinion and lots of people like them (personally, I think they’re too much work, which is why I never join). Second, I follow their twitter (we won’t talk about my feelings about twitter in general right now, because they are not good). And, third, yes, they have breaking news. So what? In order to actually follow their news, you have to go to their site, skim through it until you find the ‘latest news’ section. I don’t know if they’ve never heard of database/content management system or what, but there are a lot easier ways of doing things.
I think that, besides the fact that the website basically clutter over content, my strongest complaint is that they haven’t changed since I’ve started following cycling. Sure, they’ve done little things, but where’s the RSS feeds? Where are the blogs? Where’s the quality search engine for the site? I know that money is probably an issue, but if one of the libraries I work at can use a content/database management system, you’d think that a company could afford one (especially since it’s not that expensive). I’d like to be able to subscribe to cyclingnews and get all the news (not necessarily the race results part, but that’d be awesome, too) in my googlereader. But you can’t. I’d like to be able to directly link to different sections of each of their cycling news editions instead of linking to the main one and being all ’scroll down until …’ because that is ridiculous. I think that cyclingnews has lots of potential and … falls short. Maybe it’s just too much work, but god.
Other complaints, not directed at cyclingnews, but at fandom in general, is the fact that all the websites are different, there’s no good database of riders, races, teams (yes, cyclingnews has something, but it’s not userfriend, but I don’t think that’s actually their fault). There’s not main database of startlists. Sure, ATP Tennis has lots of money and thus their website is pretty much awesome, but the best feature is when you can do this little compare head to head thing with two players. I want to be able to do that with cyclists, I want to plug in one name and find out a) what races he’s been in and b) find out what races he’s been in with other cyclists. And I want to do the same thing with teams.
I know I’m demanding, but I work in a field where we’re supposed to be on the cutting edge of technology. I don’t think it’s asking too much for the sports I follow to be the same way. Of course, soccer/football, unlike cycling, has a multiple of professionals who write about their sport, cycling does not. For example, if I can’t watch Barcelona/Real Mardid, I can go to the Guardian and ESPNsoccernet and follow along live. If I can’t watch a race, I can go to cyclingnews and hope they’re covering it, or I can go to Eurosport and know that they’re probably not covering it. Cycling fandom (UCI, I’m looking at you, too) is stuck in the stone age.
Just like how doping’s not going to change until the cyclists and authorities change, cycling fandom’s not going to change unless the professional sites change. And since neither one of those are going to happen, I should just suck it up and deal. But it won’t make it me happy. If cycling wants more fans, they could at least work at being accessible instead of elitist. Unless that’s what we like …